Thicknessing by hand
- sebastiaan56
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:23 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
I thought I would add this link to the discussion, Derek Cohen is a legend in woodworking circles. http://www.inthewoodshop.com/WoodworkTe ... esser.html
make mine fifths........
Just had a look at this link.sebastiaan56 wrote:I thought I would add this link to the discussion, Derek Cohen is a legend in woodworking circles. http://www.inthewoodshop.com/WoodworkTe ... esser.html
For those that don't know this type of planning for the preparing of timber. Its commonly called Traversing (planning on the angle).
[img]http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y116/ImBroken8/annoyingbug.gif[/img]
http://holeshotnitro.com/
http://holeshotnitro.com/
- hilo_kawika
- Blackwood
- Posts: 144
- Joined: Mon Oct 13, 2008 10:29 am
- Location: Hilo, Hawaii
- Contact:
I built my own drum sander as well and I've probably put a mile or two of wood through it. It's capable of very accurate thicknessing if you're just patient. Here's the link to pics on my website:
http://www.ukuleles.com/BuildingHowTo/sandthck.html
aloha,
Dave Hurd
http://www.ukuleles.com
http://www.ukuleles.com/BuildingHowTo/sandthck.html
aloha,
Dave Hurd
http://www.ukuleles.com
How to become a millionaire? Start with $2 million and become a luthier...
- sebastiaan56
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:23 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
-
- Blackwood
- Posts: 414
- Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 2:27 pm
- Location: Melbourne (Ringwood), Australia
Even though I already have my home made drum sander, I had a look at these plans - I was so impressed I bought them (US$10). I reckon I'll get my money's worth just reading them. I am particularly interested in the feed table mechanism in place of my current hand feed. So Version 2 might be a good project next xmas.Lillian wrote:Woodrat, I have this set of plans. Lars just finished his over on the OLF. I was all set up to make mine when I was given a Performax for Xmas.
Thanks. Frank
- woodrat
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1154
- Joined: Tue Nov 25, 2008 6:31 am
- Location: Hastings River, NSW.
- Contact:
Thanks Lillian, I didn't see your post until today as I didn't see that there was a second page to the thread...Lillian wrote:Woodrat, I have this set of plans. Lars just finished his over on the OLF. I was all set up to make mine when I was given a Performax for Xmas.
....It looks interesting. I would love a Performax sander but the shekles are allocated elseware for a while so I might buikd this one.
Regards
John AKA Woodrat
"It's never too late to be what you might have been " - George Eliot
If you are going to make a drum sander give a bit of thought to the diameter of the drum and the corresponding speed that the sandpaper has to operate at.My experience with machinery is that a larger diameter drum /cutter head gives a much better finish.On a sander it gives you a lot more sandpaper doing the work which also helps to keep it cool.Just remember to calculate the surface speed of the drum and equate that to what the sandpaper manufacturer recommends for their paper.A larger diameter drum spinning slowly is less likely to burn the timber and is less frightening to approach with the job.Some simple pressure bars on both the infeed and outfeed will also help with accuracy.Cheers.
Cheers from Micheal.
Remember the "5P Rule".
Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance.
Remember the "5P Rule".
Preparation Prevents Piss Poor Performance.
When you're working out your drum diameter you need to have a look at your motor speed first (rpm). Most of the commercial sanders are running at about 3000 feet/minute of sand paper. What you then need to do is work out how big you need your pullies to be to get the sand paper moving at that speed with the motor you have.
My motor runs at around 1425rpm, so it was easy to find some off the shelf pullies that will turn the drum at around 3000'/min, with a 120mm diameter drum. So it's motor speed first, then pullies ('cause you've just got to go with what is easily available), then you can make corrections for speed by determining how big a diameter your drum needs to be to get you into that 3000'/min area.
Pity you're not down this way, I've got a spare motor gathering dust in the shed. You could have it for nothing, but the postage up to you would cost more than the thing is worth.
My motor runs at around 1425rpm, so it was easy to find some off the shelf pullies that will turn the drum at around 3000'/min, with a 120mm diameter drum. So it's motor speed first, then pullies ('cause you've just got to go with what is easily available), then you can make corrections for speed by determining how big a diameter your drum needs to be to get you into that 3000'/min area.
Pity you're not down this way, I've got a spare motor gathering dust in the shed. You could have it for nothing, but the postage up to you would cost more than the thing is worth.
-
- Blackwood
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:22 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, Ca.
- Contact:
That "Shop Notes" design where the power comes from a pulley mounted in place of your table saw blade is really cool. You could easily mount a DC motor on the feed belt, too, and have infinitely variable feed speed rather than hand crank it. Put a couple of hold down rollers on there, and you'd be set.
Rick Turner
Guitar Maker, Experimenter, Diviner
www.renaissanceguitars.com
www.d-tar.com
Guitar Maker, Experimenter, Diviner
www.renaissanceguitars.com
www.d-tar.com
-
- Blackwood
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:22 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, Ca.
- Contact:
-
- Wandoo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:43 am
- Location: Mount Kisco, NY
Another vote for the drum sander
I've also got a lower quality (Jet?) drumsander - which was about $200 USS. This thing is worth it's weight in gold. After (badly) planing the tops and backs of guitars #1 and #2, I found that the drum sander handled the same job much better, with zero risk for tearout (was working on some figured walnut at the time) and thicknessed the back and sides in about 20 minutes - which would have taken hours. I love working with chisels and planes - just not for thicknessing. My two cents.
Corky, I'm right there with you. I trashed three practice tops trying to get a flat surface with a plane. When I finially did, they were too thin to be used. If I had not of stumbled onto the 10/20 (thank you Rod) and been given permission to raid the savings account I probably would have given up on building a guitar until I could have built my own. Don't get my wrong, the 10/20 is still very limited in what you can reasonably do with it, but it does the lion's share of thicknessing and I can work around its short comings. Well worth the price paid.
That said, I am still working on my planing skills and tuning up my planes. Being able to use a hand plane is not something you can ignore if you want to build a guitar that looks good close up and isn't in danger of destroying itself.
That said, I am still working on my planing skills and tuning up my planes. Being able to use a hand plane is not something you can ignore if you want to build a guitar that looks good close up and isn't in danger of destroying itself.
Thicknessing plates by hand was one of the most hateful jobs in guitar building. Tops not too bad ,but backs and sides,especially in the harder woods was brutal. Afraid to use planes on expensive backs and sides resulted in hours spent sweating over cabinet scrapers and sanding blocks.Sanity returned after I built a 18 inch thickness sander.Guitar building a pleasure again. Spare your self the misery, especially if you plan to build on a regular basis. Good Luck,Tom.
The person who has never made a mistake has never made anything....!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Google and 22 guests