Live back too low when uncoupled

You can ask questions here about Trevor and Gerard's exciting new book on Luthiery.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
Thibaud
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 5:36 am

Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Thibaud » Wed Oct 05, 2022 3:00 am

Hi,

I'm currently building my first acoustic and I went for an indian rosewood live back.

Today I have completed step 12.4 "gluing the back panel". At the end of the paragraphe it says to adjust the uncoupled back frequency.
It turns out that mu back is at 169hz. Looks like i'm way too low?

Any idea if that is normal or if there is a solution to rise the frequency up?

Thanks for your help

Thibaud
Attachments
rew.jpg
rew.jpg (119.2 KiB) Viewed 21682 times

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Oct 05, 2022 10:11 am

I'd do a full tap test on the back and top once the bridge is on before deciding on any actions to adjust T(1,1)3 frequency.
Martin

Thibaud
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 5:36 am

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Thibaud » Wed Oct 05, 2022 6:11 pm

Hi kiwigeo,

Thanks for your reply. :D

I’ll follow your advice and continue my build. If worst come to worst I’ll pop the back out later.

Thibaud

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by kiwigeo » Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:39 pm

If the back has the radial bracing plus main brace over lower bout then you have the option of reducing stiffness of the back by taking material out of the centre of the back brace. To raise stiffness you can try sticking weights to the back. You can try raising the stiffness now if want by blue tacking coins to the inside of the back and seeing how it changes the tap test results.
Thibaud wrote:
Wed Oct 05, 2022 6:11 pm
Hi kiwigeo,

Thanks for your reply. :D

I’ll follow your advice and continue my build. If worst come to worst I’ll pop the back out later.

Thibaud
Martin

User avatar
Trevor Gore
Blackwood
Posts: 1629
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Trevor Gore » Tue Oct 11, 2022 9:25 pm

kiwigeo wrote:
Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:39 pm
If the back has the radial bracing plus main brace over lower bout then you have the option of reducing stiffness of the back by taking material out of the centre of the back brace.
That's correct, but reducing the stiffness will reduce the T(1,1)3 frequency. The OP wants to raise it.
kiwigeo wrote:
Mon Oct 10, 2022 8:39 pm
To raise stiffness you can try sticking weights to the back. You can try raising the stiffness now if want by blue tacking coins to the inside of the back and seeing how it changes the tap test results.
Sticking weights to the back will not alter the stiffness, but it will increase the mass, which will also lower the T(1,1)3 frequency.

If the back frequency is too low, the way to increase it is to raise the stiffness of the back. This can be done by capping the back's lower bout brace, or replacing it with a taller (or un-scalloped) one. For a 000 sized guitar with the lower bout back brace unscalloped and built to the specs in the book, the B(1,1) frequency should be typically somewhere around 240Hz.

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Oct 12, 2022 5:26 pm

Thanks Trevor...my post typed after a few too many IPA's..... :shock:
Martin

Thibaud
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 5:36 am

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Thibaud » Thu Oct 13, 2022 6:09 am

Hi,

Thanks for your answers :D I have closed the box and ended up at:

the main air 88hz
Main top 170hz
Main back 209hz.

It looks like I’m too low overall but I will follow Trevor’s advices in the book. Next Time I will follow the first advice and don’t scallop too much…

I have made the mistake to scallop the lower boot brace before closing the box so I have glued a piece of spruce back on. I will see what happen tomorrow.

Gluing fiber carbon over a X-Brace to increase stiffness would be an option? I don’t know if anyone tried before.

What is the consequences of having the main frequency too low?

Thank you very much for your help
Thibaud

User avatar
Trevor Gore
Blackwood
Posts: 1629
Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Trevor Gore » Thu Oct 13, 2022 7:18 am

Thibaud wrote:
Thu Oct 13, 2022 6:09 am
Gluing fiber carbon over a X-Brace to increase stiffness would be an option? I don’t know if anyone tried before.
See page 11-12 in the Build book.
Thibaud wrote:
Thu Oct 13, 2022 6:09 am
What is the consequences of having the main frequency too low?
"Low" is a matter of taste. The lower you take the main resonances, the more bass you get. See Design Section 3.2.2 et seq.

Thibaud
Gidgee
Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2022 5:36 am

Re: Live back too low when uncoupled

Post by Thibaud » Thu Oct 13, 2022 8:17 am

Thank you Trevor.

Your book is true gold. I’m not sure one life is enough to understand it all! Having you helping us is a massive help! Thanks for that

By the way, here is the guitar currently being built.

I’ll keep this feed updated when the guitar is complete. :)
Attachments
E3EB3A3B-931B-411E-A30E-D1A33E1A2A34.jpeg

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests