Hi Trevor,
I want to make a guitar with a compound radius fingerboard. I am in the process of designing a jig to produce said fingerboards - is the compound radius projected over the scale length of the guitar or the length or the fingerboard to a particular fret?
Thanks
Conical Fingerboards
Conical Fingerboards
Leigh
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid"
"Everybody is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid"
Re: Conical Fingerboards
Martin
- Trevor Gore
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1629
- Joined: Mon Jun 20, 2011 8:11 pm
Re: Conical Fingerboards
As per Martin's reply, above.
A few more things to think about though:
1) Once above about 16" fretboard radius, the difference between compound (based on conical sections and string spreads) and cylindrical is generally smaller than the building tolerance that most people can achieve
2) The conical geometry that I discuss in the book, Appendix II-3 (discussed in much the same way as Stewmac explains it) assumes zero neck relief. There is nearly always some relief and the amount is often larger than the build tolerances discussed above.
3) When I've built conical fretboards (and cylindrical ones, for that matter) for the way I play, I need a bit more action on the 3rd and 4th strings than a "straight line" increase in action from 1st to 6th string. The effect of this is that I prefer the saddle radius to be smaller than the fretboard radius to give the extra "lift" on the 3rd and 4th strings. So, for me, the saddle radius is often close to the 12th fret radius on a compound board.
A few more things to think about though:
1) Once above about 16" fretboard radius, the difference between compound (based on conical sections and string spreads) and cylindrical is generally smaller than the building tolerance that most people can achieve
2) The conical geometry that I discuss in the book, Appendix II-3 (discussed in much the same way as Stewmac explains it) assumes zero neck relief. There is nearly always some relief and the amount is often larger than the build tolerances discussed above.
3) When I've built conical fretboards (and cylindrical ones, for that matter) for the way I play, I need a bit more action on the 3rd and 4th strings than a "straight line" increase in action from 1st to 6th string. The effect of this is that I prefer the saddle radius to be smaller than the fretboard radius to give the extra "lift" on the 3rd and 4th strings. So, for me, the saddle radius is often close to the 12th fret radius on a compound board.
Fine classical and steel string guitars
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.
Trevor Gore, Luthier. Australian hand made acoustic guitars, classical guitars; custom guitar design and build; guitar design instruction.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests