First overseas commissions completed.
First overseas commissions completed.
You might have seen a few progress pictures of these 2 guitars in other threads. They were completed this past week, and I'm very please at how they've turned out.
I was given some fairly firm guidelines as to what was wanted. This included East Indian Rosewood, German Spruce tops. Cocobolo bindings, Ebony fretboard and bridge. Herringbone purfling, and absolutely no bwb purfs.
Nut width and neck profile were also a bit out of the norm,and the closest specs I could find were the 1930's Martin 000 neck profile. It's said to be the fingerpickers neck of choice, and I must say that it fits my larger hand much better than a 1 3/4 width nut.
The instruments were to be fairly conservative in design and appearance. The only difference between the two is the scale length, and internal bracing to accommodate same.
As usual, the finish in Mirotone 3220 over WEST Systems epoxy pore filler. 5 coats thinned 50/50, rubbed back after a week, and another 5 coats. Buffed after 2 weeks. Then a final gloss up after I got all the set up done a week later.
I was given some fairly firm guidelines as to what was wanted. This included East Indian Rosewood, German Spruce tops. Cocobolo bindings, Ebony fretboard and bridge. Herringbone purfling, and absolutely no bwb purfs.
Nut width and neck profile were also a bit out of the norm,and the closest specs I could find were the 1930's Martin 000 neck profile. It's said to be the fingerpickers neck of choice, and I must say that it fits my larger hand much better than a 1 3/4 width nut.
The instruments were to be fairly conservative in design and appearance. The only difference between the two is the scale length, and internal bracing to accommodate same.
As usual, the finish in Mirotone 3220 over WEST Systems epoxy pore filler. 5 coats thinned 50/50, rubbed back after a week, and another 5 coats. Buffed after 2 weeks. Then a final gloss up after I got all the set up done a week later.
- Bob Connor
- Admin
- Posts: 3126
- Joined: Mon Jul 09, 2007 9:43 pm
- Location: Geelong, Australia
- Contact:
The highest praise an Aussie can give. Thanks Bob.
The Auditorium (24.9" scale)has a lot more bottom end than the Orchestral (25.4" scale). The Orchestral has a nice clear voice, that really seems to carry. I took them both into my favorite music shop today, looking for some cases to ship in. They gave them a play, and said that they're my best sounding guitars yet..
I'm going to get Alan to do some recordings for me next weekend. Will post some samples when I have them.
The Auditorium (24.9" scale)has a lot more bottom end than the Orchestral (25.4" scale). The Orchestral has a nice clear voice, that really seems to carry. I took them both into my favorite music shop today, looking for some cases to ship in. They gave them a play, and said that they're my best sounding guitars yet..
I'm going to get Alan to do some recordings for me next weekend. Will post some samples when I have them.
- sebastiaan56
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1279
- Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2007 5:23 am
- Location: Blue Mountains
- ozziebluesman
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1538
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 9:12 am
- Location: Townsville
- Contact:
- J.F. Custom
- Blackwood
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
- Location: Brisbane
- Contact:
Beautiful Allen.
Very clean, crisp work. Great to hear you are happy with the results too.
I always find finishing an instrument and seeing it go to be a strange experience. It's like you have put so much time and effort into each aspect of it that it has become part of you - that which you then have to let go of. At the same time, I'm chomping at the bit and inspired to start the next project... or is that finish the other half dozen? All the time, it's what you're working toward so you know it's coming, but it's still hard, yet we go back for more, again and again. Cognitive dissonance of a luthier.
Cheers,
Jeremy.
Very clean, crisp work. Great to hear you are happy with the results too.
I always find finishing an instrument and seeing it go to be a strange experience. It's like you have put so much time and effort into each aspect of it that it has become part of you - that which you then have to let go of. At the same time, I'm chomping at the bit and inspired to start the next project... or is that finish the other half dozen? All the time, it's what you're working toward so you know it's coming, but it's still hard, yet we go back for more, again and again. Cognitive dissonance of a luthier.
Cheers,
Jeremy.
- Taffy Evans
- Blackwood
- Posts: 1038
- Joined: Wed Apr 30, 2008 6:54 pm
- Location: Charters Towers North Queensland
I got Kent Everetss voicing DVD's and followed his method. Kept more wood in the tops than I have previously. and scalloped the braces without tapering them into triangular shapes. The X-brace is also very forward shifted compared to previous builds.
His theory, as far as I can discern is that you want a top to have some wood in it so that it has some room to develop. It's also the first time that I've used German Spruce, but I've got no idea if that has made a difference.
First off, I kept thining the top and giving it the "wobble" test, as in Robbie O'brian's video. I'm guessing he learnt this from Kent. When it sounds like a piece of sheet metal that is getting flexed, then stop thinning. Or if it has reached your limit for how thin you're willing to go, then stop.
One top was taken down to .130" the other to .125".'
Then the bracing is scalloped and top is tap tested to get a long, ring, that has an initial attack, then returns but more subtle. What surprised me is that if you listen carefully it does work that way when the braces get to a certain profile.
Finally, after binding, the outer edge of the lower bout is thinned a bit.
I also kept the sides and back thicker, wanting them to be very stiff, with the solid linings. Taking a bit of advice from Dave White about making the box heavier.
His theory, as far as I can discern is that you want a top to have some wood in it so that it has some room to develop. It's also the first time that I've used German Spruce, but I've got no idea if that has made a difference.
First off, I kept thining the top and giving it the "wobble" test, as in Robbie O'brian's video. I'm guessing he learnt this from Kent. When it sounds like a piece of sheet metal that is getting flexed, then stop thinning. Or if it has reached your limit for how thin you're willing to go, then stop.
One top was taken down to .130" the other to .125".'
Then the bracing is scalloped and top is tap tested to get a long, ring, that has an initial attack, then returns but more subtle. What surprised me is that if you listen carefully it does work that way when the braces get to a certain profile.
Finally, after binding, the outer edge of the lower bout is thinned a bit.
I also kept the sides and back thicker, wanting them to be very stiff, with the solid linings. Taking a bit of advice from Dave White about making the box heavier.
- Dave White
- Blackwood
- Posts: 452
- Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:10 am
- Location: Hughenden Valley, England
- Contact:
Allen,
Congratulations on your commission - a really tasy looking pair of guitars there. It's nice to watch your building skills progress with each instrument and with Bob/Dave to paraphrase Collin Welland from the "Chariots of Fire" year - "Watch out - the Ozzies are coming!!".
I really agree about making instruments with a view to where the sound will be a year or so down the track as things settle and mature compared with the "instant hit" (they still sound great from new) and also to leaving tops thicker than many builders do in the centre, which is one firm base for building the mids/trebles in my view.
Well done again.
Congratulations on your commission - a really tasy looking pair of guitars there. It's nice to watch your building skills progress with each instrument and with Bob/Dave to paraphrase Collin Welland from the "Chariots of Fire" year - "Watch out - the Ozzies are coming!!".
I really agree about making instruments with a view to where the sound will be a year or so down the track as things settle and mature compared with the "instant hit" (they still sound great from new) and also to leaving tops thicker than many builders do in the centre, which is one firm base for building the mids/trebles in my view.
Well done again.
Dave White
[url=http://www.defaoiteguitars.com]De Faoite Stringed Instruments[/url]
[url=http://www.defaoiteguitars.com]De Faoite Stringed Instruments[/url]
Allen bro here's the greatest praise that a Hesh... can give - Super Clean and superb craftsmanship!!!
I found it interesting that your client did not want any stinkin white on the purfs. I hate white on the purfs and get a lot of flack from forum members when ever I say so... I never understood why one would want to go to all the trouble to use beautiful woods and then incorporate a color (white) that does not appear naturally in nature commonly on woods... Maple is different, it's not really white under finish and I like the look of maple but white sucks to me too... Go figure.
The finish is superb too and I think that you have about the shiniest finish that I have ever seen in guitar pics.
The coco bindings look fantastic with the EIRW too.
I wanted to ask you about the neck width at the nut - is it wider than 1.75"?
Great job times 2!![/b]
I found it interesting that your client did not want any stinkin white on the purfs. I hate white on the purfs and get a lot of flack from forum members when ever I say so... I never understood why one would want to go to all the trouble to use beautiful woods and then incorporate a color (white) that does not appear naturally in nature commonly on woods... Maple is different, it's not really white under finish and I like the look of maple but white sucks to me too... Go figure.
The finish is superb too and I think that you have about the shiniest finish that I have ever seen in guitar pics.
The coco bindings look fantastic with the EIRW too.
I wanted to ask you about the neck width at the nut - is it wider than 1.75"?
Great job times 2!![/b]
- John Maddison
- Blackwood
- Posts: 355
- Joined: Tue Jun 03, 2008 11:15 pm
- Location: Albany, Western Australia
- Contact:
Re: First overseas commissions completed.
AllenAllen wrote: ... the closest specs I could find were the 1930's Martin 000 neck profile.
Are these profiles displayed somewhere in cyber_web_land?
Exquisite work, as always btw
Cheers
John M
-
- Blackwood
- Posts: 311
- Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:22 am
- Location: Santa Cruz, Ca.
- Contact:
Very, very nice.
A thought...stiff back and sides makes for a guitar that projects forward, hence the guitar is loud to an audience, but not so much for the player. That can actually make for a hard sell...guitar players want to really feel enveloped, especially if they are primarily living room players, and that first impression can make or break a sale.
I've taken the stiff back and sides thing to an extreme just this side of going to a Smallman-style laminated back. To give something back to the player, I put in side ports. Seems to give the best of both worlds to player and audience.
However, I now ask potential clients how they intend to use the guitar. If they are primarily home-bound livingroom players or they just play at small parties, I'll go thin with back and sides to give more of that lush warmth to the player. You can also build a smaller guitar that has bottom end for the player that way. "0" and "00" guitar sizes can be amazing in a small room when build lightly. That I really learned from some mid 18th Century Martins and my 1890s Howe Ormes.
A thought...stiff back and sides makes for a guitar that projects forward, hence the guitar is loud to an audience, but not so much for the player. That can actually make for a hard sell...guitar players want to really feel enveloped, especially if they are primarily living room players, and that first impression can make or break a sale.
I've taken the stiff back and sides thing to an extreme just this side of going to a Smallman-style laminated back. To give something back to the player, I put in side ports. Seems to give the best of both worlds to player and audience.
However, I now ask potential clients how they intend to use the guitar. If they are primarily home-bound livingroom players or they just play at small parties, I'll go thin with back and sides to give more of that lush warmth to the player. You can also build a smaller guitar that has bottom end for the player that way. "0" and "00" guitar sizes can be amazing in a small room when build lightly. That I really learned from some mid 18th Century Martins and my 1890s Howe Ormes.
Rick Turner
Guitar Maker, Experimenter, Diviner
www.renaissanceguitars.com
www.d-tar.com
Guitar Maker, Experimenter, Diviner
www.renaissanceguitars.com
www.d-tar.com
John, you can get neck templates from Tracey at Luthier Supplies.
Hesh, the nut is 46 mm wide or 1 13/16'. And making them shinny is easy. Taking the pictures so that you don't just see glare is far more difficult.
I wasn't sure about the bindings going with the IRW, but I'm pleased with how the colors play off of each other. It was rather different to build to someone else's taste. In one sense it's frustrating in that I think something else would look better, but liberating in that I don't have to worry too much about it, as it's what the customer wants.
Hesh, the nut is 46 mm wide or 1 13/16'. And making them shinny is easy. Taking the pictures so that you don't just see glare is far more difficult.
I wasn't sure about the bindings going with the IRW, but I'm pleased with how the colors play off of each other. It was rather different to build to someone else's taste. In one sense it's frustrating in that I think something else would look better, but liberating in that I don't have to worry too much about it, as it's what the customer wants.
- Nick
- Blackwood
- Posts: 3639
- Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:20 am
- Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
- Contact:
Bob I'd like to request an emoticon whereby it's jaw drops all the way to the floor, & I'll take two thanks.
Very smooth Mr McFarlen! beautiful, clean execution and the finish is Gaaaaawwwgeous. I like your blending of the neck profile into the headstock volute area, looks a very smooth & comfortable place for the hand.
I got some West System for laminating my CF/spruce braces together, looks like I now know how I'm going to pore fill it
Very smooth Mr McFarlen! beautiful, clean execution and the finish is Gaaaaawwwgeous. I like your blending of the neck profile into the headstock volute area, looks a very smooth & comfortable place for the hand.
I got some West System for laminating my CF/spruce braces together, looks like I now know how I'm going to pore fill it
"Jesus Loves You."
Nice to hear in church but not in a Mexican prison.
Nice to hear in church but not in a Mexican prison.
Allen, Kent's DVD is good isn't it. The first one I made after watching it all was so much better sounding than previous attempts. Just gives some context to tuning so you kind of know where you are going.
I have an OM and 2 L-00s currently being made following the tips in the dvd and I have high hopes for them both. Boxes sound very lively.
Cheers
Dom
I have an OM and 2 L-00s currently being made following the tips in the dvd and I have high hopes for them both. Boxes sound very lively.
Cheers
Dom
You can bomb the world to pieces,
but you can't bomb the world to peace!
but you can't bomb the world to peace!
Hi Allen
First… great looking guitars! I love the clean classic look and that head shape works so well with it.
I was wondering how you found building for someone who had firm ideas on what they wanted compared to building when you have all the creative power? As someone who only builds for fun and gives them as gifts, I think it would be an interesting challenge to build to a set of requirements onther than what I though would work best (well I sold the last one but that doesn't count, as it was unintentional… sold it by accident).
Cheers
James
First… great looking guitars! I love the clean classic look and that head shape works so well with it.
I was wondering how you found building for someone who had firm ideas on what they wanted compared to building when you have all the creative power? As someone who only builds for fun and gives them as gifts, I think it would be an interesting challenge to build to a set of requirements onther than what I though would work best (well I sold the last one but that doesn't count, as it was unintentional… sold it by accident).
Cheers
James
It's a bit daunting in a way James. Obviously the client has pretty firm ideas about some aspects that needed to be as spot on as I could make them. And I'm hoping that I pulled them off. Some things like nut width, scale and what not are pretty easy, you just need to be sure of the measurements, and believe me, I checked them far more than twice.
The aesthetics though are something else. I'd have never thought of using the Cocoblolo with IRW Even when I had them laying on the bench together would I have thought that they'd work, but I'm glad that this was insisted upon. I'd never have used the Cocobolo in the rosette, and after using it, I'd never use it again. It's a total pain in the arse to use in those dimensions, and in spruce. It bleeds color like nothing I've ever come across, and it's the one thing that I'm not too proud of on these instruments.
Then there is the uncertainty that the instrument will have the sound and playability and all kind of other things that I don't want to worry about when a client has plunked down hard cash up front. Much different when you build for the pure joy of it, and if someone picks up an instrument and loves the way it plays and sound.
There is also a difference to how I feel when I'm out in the shed working away. While there is a great deal of pride and satisfaction that someone want to pay you for your work, it's just a bit of a different mind set to going out and puttering away without a dead line.
The aesthetics though are something else. I'd have never thought of using the Cocoblolo with IRW Even when I had them laying on the bench together would I have thought that they'd work, but I'm glad that this was insisted upon. I'd never have used the Cocobolo in the rosette, and after using it, I'd never use it again. It's a total pain in the arse to use in those dimensions, and in spruce. It bleeds color like nothing I've ever come across, and it's the one thing that I'm not too proud of on these instruments.
Then there is the uncertainty that the instrument will have the sound and playability and all kind of other things that I don't want to worry about when a client has plunked down hard cash up front. Much different when you build for the pure joy of it, and if someone picks up an instrument and loves the way it plays and sound.
There is also a difference to how I feel when I'm out in the shed working away. While there is a great deal of pride and satisfaction that someone want to pay you for your work, it's just a bit of a different mind set to going out and puttering away without a dead line.
-
- Wandoo
- Posts: 14
- Joined: Wed Apr 22, 2009 1:43 am
- Location: Mount Kisco, NY
Wow
What a beautiful pair of guitars.... Gives me something to shoot for. Congratulations.
- Stephen Kinnaird
- Blackwood
- Posts: 287
- Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 1:45 pm
- Location: Texas, USA
Dadgum, those are lovely.
It's all been said, but let me just pile on, Allen: beautiful work!
As picky as your customer was, did he specify that the herringbone in the rosette run counter closckwise?
If not, how did you choose the direction?
(Anal question, I know, but hey--that's what we are, right?)
Congrats,
Steve
It's all been said, but let me just pile on, Allen: beautiful work!
As picky as your customer was, did he specify that the herringbone in the rosette run counter closckwise?
If not, how did you choose the direction?
(Anal question, I know, but hey--that's what we are, right?)
Congrats,
Steve
There are some great woods, down under!
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 21 guests