does mass of the nut matter?

Talk about musical instrument construction, setup and repair.

Moderators: kiwigeo, Jeremy D

Post Reply
User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

does mass of the nut matter?

Post by Mark McLean » Mon Sep 28, 2015 6:28 pm

I have built my last few acoustic guitars using a zero fret, for various reasons. I quite like it for simplicity of setup, and the tuning seems smoother (less friction, no "sticking" of strings in the nut slots). You still need a nut, but it is reduced simply to being a string spacing device at the top of the neck. I have used the same nut as normal, but lower and with deeper slots so the string bears on the zero fret, not on the leading edge of the nut.

Anyway, I don't necessarily want to start a debate on pro/cons of a zero fret setup. But if you do use one, would it be OK to use a much more slender nut than a traditional one? Perhaps something more like you see on a Fender electric neck, or same width as the saddle. Would the reduction in mass at the top of the fretboard be likely to have a significant effect (e.g. on sustain)? The converse question is whether a heavier nut (e.g. brass) would have any effect if used in a traditional setup?

Mark

User avatar
Nick
Blackwood
Posts: 3639
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:20 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by Nick » Tue Sep 29, 2015 6:33 am

Something as small as a 'nut' I can't see having any noticeable effect on any of the things we are trying to build in to our guitars (sustain, tone e.t.c) when it's used in a zero fret situation, as you say, the strings aren't in any direct load-bearing contact with the 'string guide' (because that's all it is in this situation effectively) so isn't affecting anything directly and as far as adding mass, it's probably too bugger all to make any difference so making it thinner?....personally I can't see a problem with it.
"Jesus Loves You."
Nice to hear in church but not in a Mexican prison.

seeaxe
Blackwood
Posts: 769
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 7:20 pm
Location: Auckland NZ

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by seeaxe » Tue Sep 29, 2015 2:24 pm

I don't think it matters, zero fret or not.

I build with zero frets and on my classicals I use a normal nut blank but generally it is as low or even lower than the zero fret, so i can level frets with it in place, if required. (because I can put it in before finish goes on and get a better detail at the nut/neck/headstock interface). Point being it doesn't really matter what thickness the nut is, it's just a spacer as you say. By the time mine is levelled off there's not much left any way so it's pretty light.
Hope that helps.
Cheers
Richard

User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by Mark McLean » Tue Sep 29, 2015 10:40 pm

OK, that is in line with my thoughts too. I have heard of people claiming that adding a lot of mass to the headstock - like a substantial steel G-clamp - will increase sustain. But also makes the guitar impossible to hold, and looks stupid. Even that might be a myth, and it is hard to imagine that something as small as the nut would have a significant mass effect. You have given me license to go ahead and use whatever works and looks good.

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by kiwigeo » Wed Sep 30, 2015 9:11 am

Mark McLean wrote:OK, that is in line with my thoughts too. I have heard of people claiming that adding a lot of mass to the headstock - like a substantial steel G-clamp - will increase sustain. But also makes the guitar impossible to hold, and looks stupid. Even that might be a myth, and it is hard to imagine that something as small as the nut would have a significant mass effect. You have given me license to go ahead and use whatever works and looks good.
The clamp on the headstock thing isn't a myth.

I cant see a nut adding significantly to mass of the headstock unless it's made of lead.
Martin

User avatar
J.F. Custom
Blackwood
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by J.F. Custom » Thu Oct 01, 2015 10:03 pm

Even more so, we are talking about the mass difference between two different size nuts - not even a nut or no nut. The difference would be very small and you'd be doing pretty well to concern yourself with that over other more pressing issues.

Now, a compensated zero fret on the other hand... There's a pain. :wink:

Jeremy.

User avatar
Mark McLean
Blackwood
Posts: 1124
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:03 pm
Location: Sydney

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by Mark McLean » Fri Oct 02, 2015 7:57 am

Now, a compensated zero fret on the other hand... There's a pain. :wink:
Jeremy.
Mine are dead straight and simple!
So, Jeremy, have you had a go at a compensated zero fret? Any stories to tell?
I have seen this picture of one by Nigel Forster
forster compensated zero fret.jpg
forster compensated zero fret.jpg (82 KiB) Viewed 11526 times
]

User avatar
J.F. Custom
Blackwood
Posts: 779
Joined: Fri May 01, 2009 9:13 pm
Location: Brisbane
Contact:

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by J.F. Custom » Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:20 pm

No Mark - no personal experience here.

Was just commenting. No reason you could not do it, but what a pain to do! As that picture demonstrates... :wink:

Jeremy.

User avatar
kiwigeo
Admin
Posts: 10687
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 5:57 pm
Location: Adelaide, Sth Australia

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by kiwigeo » Fri Oct 02, 2015 10:38 pm

J.F. Custom wrote: Was just commenting. No reason you could not do it, but what a pain to do! As that picture demonstrates... :wink:

Jeremy.
Could be worse.......
TT.jpg
Martin

aljosha
Kauri
Posts: 32
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 7:12 am

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by aljosha » Sat Oct 03, 2015 11:20 am

wow,

I dont understand why anyone would use a zerofret in the first place, unless he aint got no time to do it properly...
and then that thing... :shock:

User avatar
Nick
Blackwood
Posts: 3639
Joined: Thu Feb 26, 2009 11:20 am
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand
Contact:

Re: does mass of the nut matter?

Post by Nick » Mon Oct 05, 2015 6:02 am

aljosha wrote:wow,

I dont understand why anyone would use a zerofret in the first place, unless he aint got no time to do it properly...
and then that thing... :shock:
A zero fret isn't an inferior way of achieving the same thing it's just a different way and besides, if you think about it, a Zero fret would actually take longer because you still have to cut slots in a guide 'nut' as well as leveling the zero fret. I'd take a zero fret over a poorly executed nut any day. I build using both by the way, depending on the instrument, so have no personal bias toward one over the other, as I said they both achieve the same thing.
"Jesus Loves You."
Nice to hear in church but not in a Mexican prison.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests